Saturday, 14 January 2017

Beowulf.

This brings us onto 'Beowulf', possibly the earliest surviving work of English Literature. We don't know who wrote it, or exactly when, but it's estimated to have been first written down between the 8th and 10th Centuries.

'Beowulf' began as one of these epic poems told by travelling Bards or 'Scops'. It seems that somebody had begun to write down a few of these oral tales, however 'Beowulf' is the only one to survive from this same time. It's important to remember that Britain was now a Christian country again, so the pagan tales were re-worked as they were written in order to conform to Christian ideals.

'Beowulf' is a heroic tale involving two Viking tribes; the Geats and the Danes. The Danes are being terrorised by a dragon (Grendel) and call in the noble Beowulf (a Geat) to help them. This was a tradition in this time period-the idea of Blood Feuds. This is the idea that every human life has a literal monetary value, so if you killed someone, so long as you paid their family the correct amount of money, you were ok. That's a very basic description but you get the idea. So, Beowulf's father was guilty of killing someone, but didn't pay the price. Beowulf comes to help the Danes as he is repaying the King (Hrothgar) for settling his father's debt all those years ago, and stopping him from becoming an outcast. Beowulf has to come back later to defeat Grendels' mother (a descendent of Cain from the Bible) too. 

A piece of art based on the tale of 'Beowulf'. (Andrew Mayer.com)

Chivalry, nobility and heroism were big themes in these kinds of tales. 'Beowulf is an epic poem, meaning that it is hella long. Epic poems tended to contain elements of the supernatural, such as monsters, conflict, a hero, an adventure and a visit to the Underworld. You can see a clear link here between 'Beowulf' and Homer's 'Odyssey'.

'Beowulf' is written about the past, so although it was probably written between the 8th and the 10th Centuries, it is thought to be based in an earlier time. It is also thought that there were two writers, probably scribes of the same Abbey (remember, monks were the writers of the past). 

The text is written in a three-part structure, in three different locations. As it was written in the Dark Ages, the scribes aimed to bring a Christian sensibility to this Pagan Tale (the Geats were Pagan). There is only one manuscript of the text in existence, and it has some fire damage. 

The characters' names in this text are difficult to pronounce and they all look the same, so good luck with that! We were told to just pick one way of saying a name and stick to that, wrong or right! These names include: Heorogar, Hrothmund, Hrothulf, Hrethric, Haethcyn, Hygelac and Ongentheow. There are some easy ones though, like: Beowulf, Shield, Beow and Halfdane. I dare say they are easy to pronounce if you know how! But as an English person, I am more used to names like 'James' and 'Amy', so the names in Beowulf produce some awkward noises during our lectures as we try to sound them out! The names contain compound words, just like modern German names. So the name 'Beowulf' is a compound meaning 'glory' and 'spear', which excellently describes his heroic yet boastful character.

There are references to other Germanic-based tales in 'Beowulf', but the disillusion of the monasteries led to the destruction of post of the manuscripts. I remember being told that 'Beowulf' was thrown out of the window to save it.  

An interesting part of 'Beowulf' is that the Scop actually appears in the story at one point, as he re-tells the story of the death of Grendel's mother, to entertain the other characters. Perhaps some similarities could be drawn here between the Scop in 'Beowulf' and Geoffrey Chaucer's character 'Chaucer' in 'The Canterbury Tales'...

Women didn't really play a big part in stories during this time period, although Grendel's Mother is a main character in this text (but note that she doesn't get her own name). There were 'peace-weaver' characters in 'Beowulf'; women who married between tribes to bring them together. Examples in 'Beowulf' are Freawaru and the Queen. The hostess women in the text have a very big and important ritual with the 'mead cup', where they use it to indicate the hierarchy within the tribe. People also inherited through the mother's line, so mothers were very important in this way. Grendel's Mother and Thrif are female characters, however as the evil characters they are anti-peace-weavers. They possess very masculine qualities and aim to kill anyone who enters the Halls. Thrif changes and becomes peaceful with her marriage to Offer, whereas Grendel's Mother is only tamed by death.

Angelina Jolie played 'Grendel's Mother' in the 2007 film 'Beowulf'.


Kennings play a large part in 'Beowulf'. A Kenning is a literary device which is so simple and yet so effective. It is also a convention of Anglo-Saxon poetry. So what is a Kenning? Well here are some examples: 'swan's-road' and 'ring-giver'. Got it yet? It's so simple...it's just another way to say a word. For example, instead of saying 'we crossed the sea', a scribe will write 'we crossed the swan's road', or instead of saying 'the King', they may say 'the ring-giver'. There are some well-known and some lesser known Kennings, but they are quite easy to figure out. 

There are other conventions of Anglo-Saxon poetry besides Kennings. For example, each line will have two halves, with a strong caesura in the middle. Anglo-Saxon is a stressed language, so the meter is based on stresses and pitch. The mid-line pause organises the line and may have been marked by a harp (poetry was nearly-always read aloud in this time period, quite often to a large audience). The initial letter of the first stress of the second half of the line is key to the alliteration of the piece, but the last stress of the line mustn't alliterate. That sounds complicated, but it's not, I promise. What it means is that in this passage: 

"monstrous hell-bride, brooded on her wrongs.
She had been forced down into fearful waters, 
the cold depths, after Cain had killed
his father's son, felled his own
brother with a sword. Branded an outlaw," 
(lines 1259-1263, page 69, The Norton Anthology of English Literature, Volume A)

all of the letters in bold alliterate, but the last words on each line don't. This was all done to create rhythm and therefore make the epic poem easier to remember and recite.

Seamus Heaney translated the text from its original Old English into a more understandable English. However, it is important to remember that every person who translates a text puts their own slight spin on it. For example, Heaney begins with the word 'So', as is traditional in Irish tales. He also links the story to the violence in Northern Ireland in the 1970s. 

In the original Old English, the text would have looked something like this:

"frumsceaft fira feorran reccan,"

this translates to 

"[the] origin [of] men from far [time] [to] recount,"

this is line 91 from the text. Obviously the alliteration is clearly visible in this language. I could include more lines in this form as it is quite interesting to try to read, however a lot of the language requires symbols which I do not have on my laptop! 
The original 'Beowulf' manuscript, written in Old English.

That was a very quick and simple breakdown of what I have learned about 'Beowulf'. I hope it is helpful to anyone in search of some quick and simple notes on the subject. To me, the text was murder to read, but this is only because it is 3182 lines long and I was given two days to read it! But I would definitely recommend it to anyone interested in the classics, who can stick with the poem style and loves a good 'knight-in-shining-armour' tale. For me, the interesting part comes with the history and context of a piece of literature.


Wednesday, 11 January 2017

The Canon.

***Important Notice, we are not referring to cannons, the weapon:
We are referring to the Canon (one 'n'): the literary model. So think:
 

 
Now you're on the right track.
 
 
The Literary Canon, described very basically, is a list of books that have been decided on as the books that everyone should read/study/know about. The word 'Canon' comes from the Greek 'Kanon', meaning 'a yard stick' or 'a measuring rod'. So the Literary Canon is a model of examples that can be used to measure other books by in terms of greatness.
 
 
A good quote to use if you are writing about the Literary Canon in an essay.
 
 
"The sense of the word [canon] important to literary critics first appeared in the fourth century A.D., when 'canon' was used to signify a list of texts or authors, specifically the books of the Bible and of the early theologians of Christianity. In this context 'canon' suggested to its users a principle of selection by which some authors or texts were deemed worthier of preservation than others."
 
(Jon Guillory, 'Canon', in Critical Terms for Literary Study, ed. Frank Lentricchia and Thomas McLaughlin, 2nd ed., University of Chicago Press, 1995)
 
So what texts make up the Literary Canon?
 
Oh, there's a butt-load.  Popular texts in the Canon include:
 

  • Pride and Prejudice- Jane Austen
  • The Great Gatsby- F. Scott Fitzgerald
  • Wuthering Heights- Emily Bronte
  • Romeo and Juliet- Shakespeare
  • The Catcher in the Rye- J. D. Salinger
  • Hamlet- Shakespeare
  • Dracula- Bram Stoker
  • The Canterbury Tales- Geoffrey Chaucer 
  • A Tale of Two Cities- Charles Dickens
  • To Kill a Mockingbird- Harper Lee
  • Animal Farm- George Orwell
 
And loads more. For a longer, fuller list please visit https://www.goodreads.com/shelf/show/literary-canon
 
Do these texts sound familiar? They should. All institutions of education, such as secondary schools, choose texts from the canon to study. This is because texts that make the Literary Canon are regarded as the best examples of literature in history. All of the texts I study on my course are part of the Literary Canon.
 
If you hated learning about these texts in school, here's who to blame:
 
Old white men. Yep. They did it again.
 
***Please remember that everything that I put on here has been taught to me by my trained lecturers. Having said that, I am in no way claiming to have all the answers. Please do further research and find accurate sources to reference. Consider me a simple study guide; a starting point.
 
As far as I have been taught, the Literary Canon was created in the Victorian era, when Britain was trying to show literature as its crowning glory. A list was to be produced of the best examples of literature throughout history, to show the rest of the world what we could do.
 
However, it is necessary to remember at this point: who was in charge in the Victorian era? Who would have been coming up with this list?
 
Old. British. White. Men.
 
Which, of course, is not a problem until you realise that this means that most (not all, but most) of the Literary Canon is made up of texts written by old, British, white men. Yep, they're helping themselves. Who Knew.
 
In today's society, we can recognise the problematic issues that arise when discussing the Literary Canon, such as the fact that the texts are mostly written by white males. This obviously excludes women and black authors. This does not mean to say that their writing is not as good, it just shows how Victorian society (and most historical societies) benefitted white men and oppressed all others.
 
Another issue here is the fact that we all have different tastes and opinions. What makes 'Wuthering Heights' by Emily Bronte more important than 'The Very Hungry Caterpillar' by Eric Carle? Who is to say that one carries more literary worth than the other? If you ask a room of students to write a list of books that they would choose to show an alien race, in order to represent themselves, they would most likely choose some books that are part of the Canon, but also many other non-canonical texts that they have enjoyed. That's what we did in my class.
 
These are quite deep and unanswerable questions. I think that when talking about the Literary Canon, it is important to keep in mind that a list had to be produced, and therefore a list was produced. This does not mean that these texts are the be-all and end-all of good literature. It's all done on someone's opinion, so take it with a pinch of salt, but as far as classic and famous texts go, the Literary Canon is a very good place to start.
 
 


English Literature, Where Did it All Begin?

Year one of my degree is made up of four modules (like subjects within English Literature):

  1. History of English Literature
  2. Literary Criticism
  3. Imaginative Writing
  4. Myth, Mystery and Metamorphosis
I'm going to try to include a bit of each of these in my blog. Lets see how this goes.


So, let's start at the very beginning (it's a very good place to start).

Roots.

English, as a language, started as 'Celtic' between C1-5AD. In this period, Britain was part of the Roman Empire. It was then invaded by pagan tribes from Northern Europe (Angles, Saxons and Jutes). You might recognise the word 'Angles' as it sounds like 'Anglais' (the French word for 'English'. This is because the Angles came from Europe and brought with them their language: Anglisc-this marks the beginning of the English language as we know it today.

Anglo-Saxon/Old English. (450-1100AD)

The Anglo-Saxon invaders (if you live in England then you must have heard of them at some point, Time Team especially like to chat about them) brought with them a very old tradition-oral poetry. Basically, (prepare yourself for a sweeping statement) nothing was written down until the Seventh Century. The earliest manuscripts then began production in the monasteries.

Up until that point, travelling Bards would learn stories off by heart and go up and down the country repeating them. They were often patriotic, heroic, moral and contained SOME element of truth. Most importantly, these tales rhymed and had a meter. This was very important as it made them easier for the Bards to remember (some were thousands of lines long).


Literary Periods and main texts.

  • 450-1066- Old English (Anglo-Saxon) Period: Beowulf
Also known as the Middle Ages, this period mostly produced written manuscripts of oral poetry. The characteristic literary form of this period is alliterative accentual verse.
  • 1066-1500- Middle English Period: Geoffrey Chaucer's 'Canterbury Tales
A new period begins here because the Norman Conquest of 1066 has brought significant changes to both the English language and its literature. Characteristic genres are the verse romance, mystery plays and morality plays.
  • late 15th- early 17th C-The Renaissance: Shakespeare
This period marks the English Renaissance as opposed to the earlier Italian Renaissance. It spanned two centuries, although the reign of Queen Elizabeth 1st is considered to be its high point. The Elizabethan audience were able to view the works of William Shakespeare and Christopher Marlowe. After her death came the Jacobean Age, remembered in literature as the age of the Metaphysical poets such as John Donne. The final part of the Renaissance was a very confusing time, involving the overthrow of King Charles 1st and the Interregnum period. One famous text from this era is John Milton's epic 'Paradise Lost'.
  • 1660-1745-The Neoclassical period: Oroonoko
This period includes the Restoration Period (1660-1700) in which Britain's first published female author, Aphra Behn, wrote the brilliant 'Oroonoko'. It also includes the Augustan Age (1700-1745) in which John Gay produced his wonderful work 'The Beggar's Opera' (1728).
  • 1780s-1830s-The Romantic Period: choose your own from about a Billion texts
I think that this is the period most people think of when they talk about English Literature. Think Victorians, think classical poetry, think of English Literature at its highest point in society. And from this entire period the text I was given to study was...'The Interesting Narrative of Olaudah Equiano'. Never heard of it? No, neither had I. But let me tell you, it is a heart-breaking, heroic adventure written by a slave and based on true events. I'd choose that over 'ponsy' Victorian poetry any day.




A Degree in English Literature?!

So the reason I haven't written anything in months is because back in September 2016 I began a Bachelors Degree in English Literature!

I have posted before about how I love English but was unsure whether to do it as a degree as I couldn't see a future in it.....well.....basically I've gone for the 'Follow Your Dreams' method and I'm currently hoping for the best!

I am not trying to become the next J K Rowling or Charles Dickens, I just want to read books and talk about them all day! And that's exactly what I get to do! Honestly, some days I just sit in my lectures smiling like a maniac because I get to discuss Shakespeare all day and it makes me so happy! I am so glad I decided to follow a path that makes me happy, even though I am unsure where it will take me. University is hard and I know that if I had picked a subject with a more secure future, but one that didn't interest me as much, I'd be screwed! It's your passion that keeps you going when times get tough and you have four essays due in at once! I've learnt that if you don't love what you do, it's very hard to stay motivated.

So, I attend a very small university twice a week, where there are only two other students in my class. This may surprise you, however I am not shocked. I live in the middle of nowhere. In my primary school there were 106 students, 10 of whom were in my year. In my Photography college course which I completed last year there were only 5 of us in my class. I like it better this way though, as it means guaranteed one-to-one time with the lecturer, faster marking and a closer knit group which results in less fear to join in in class discussions. Our lecturers can whizz through their presentations and then we can all discuss and debate topics for the rest of the time. I imagine if you attend a major university where there are hundreds of students in a lecture, your questions won't get heard and the lecturer may not even know who you are. Well there's no chance of that happening where I go!

The work is hard. Well, actually it's not. It's reading and writing and thinking, which we can all do. The work LOAD is hard! Seriously, my lecturers will all be like "Over the weekend, read this entire book, answer these questions on it, read these two poems, don't forget to write your 1500 word essay due next week, start your presentation which is due the week after and don't forget to read your own books in your spare time,".........yeah, sure, ok!! I'll just not go to work, not sleep and not socialise!

Sometimes it feels like we're drowning, but as a close-knit group we can support each other and we know we're in this together. The trick is to start things as soon as you get them! Right now I'm off (Christmas Holidays) until the 30th of January, which is a rest I definitely needed, especially as we still had essays to hand in over the Christmas period. During term times I am basically a hermit.

My timetable looks like this:
Monday- Three very long lectures that take up the whole day
Tuesday- Quick! Try do read everything they set!
Wednesday- Bang out some essay material
Thursday- Three very long lectures that take up the whole day
Friday- work (waitressing) all day
Saturday- Quick! study study study! Then its off to the pub for a rare social moment!
Sunday- Quick morning out with the boyfriend, then its back to studying!

It took me a long time to get used to this routine. I used to work 25hr weeks while I attended college, so when the university said I'd only be in 2 days a week, I though 'great, I can work the rest of the week!'...oh how wrong I was! It was clear from the beginning that this course came with a massive amount of homework, but luckily my boyfriend understands how much this degree means to me, and once I told my boss my situation, we were able to sort things out.

All I can say is "Thank God for student loans!".